A content audit tool
vs. an engine that also fixes it
A content audit tool scans your site and hands you a list of problems in a dashboard. That is where its job ends: the fix is still yours. And since it does not know your catalog, it can tell you a post is missing internal links, but not which product page of yours it should link to.
A content audit tool is software that scans your site and delivers the report: posts losing positions, duplicate titles, orphan articles, content nobody reads anymore. It is a good diagnosis and it ends at the to-do list. Content Mood makes that same diagnosis and keeps going: it writes the change for the post that is losing traffic while keeping the URL, connects it to the real product pages and categories in your catalog —which a generic tool does not know, because it does not know what you sell— and leaves it ready for you to review and publish. The Content Mood diagnosis is free too, but it is step 1 of a cycle (diagnose, refresh, connect), not the whole product.
The difference, field by field
| Content audit tool | Content Mood | |
|---|---|---|
| What it hands you | A report listing the problems it found | The same findings and, on top, the change already written |
| Where its job ends | In the dashboard: detected and prioritized | In a CSV ready to upload to your CMS |
| Who writes the fix | You, or whoever you hire next | The engine proposes it; you approve or reject |
| Internal links | It tells you they are missing | It tells you which specific product page or category to link to (the differentiator) |
| Knowledge of the catalog | None: it does not know what you sell | It reads the real products and categories in your store |
| Scope | The whole site, in technical terms | The blog of an online store, in commercial terms |
| What it measures | Problems found and problems pending | Traffic recovered and clicks to the catalog |
| Measuring the after | It scans again and marks the problem as solved | Before and after on the refreshed post, keeping the same URL |
| Who it works for | Whoever already has someone to execute | The store with nobody writing today |
Where the chain breaks
Detecting and fixing are two different jobs. One of the two stays on your plate.
It diagnoses well and stops there. The two steps that cost time —writing the change and publishing it— stay open.
The same detection, and then the change written and linked. All that is left on your side is saying yes.
Why detecting is not fixing
Detecting is the cheap part
A scanner can tell you in ten minutes that thirty-eight articles do not have a single outbound link. That is not the bottleneck. The bottleneck is the thirty-eight afternoons of opening each post, deciding what to change, rewriting it without breaking what already ranks and uploading it again. The list is generated fast; the list does not execute itself.
An internal link is not just any link
A missing link is an objective fact in the HTML, and any scanner sees it. Choosing the destination is another matter: it takes knowing what you sell, which category answers the intent of that article and where the link fits inside the text without sounding bolted on. A generic tool cannot solve it because it has not read your catalog. That is commercial judgment, not a technical check.
A diagnosis that changes nothing ends up as noise
The next scan returns the same problems plus the new ones, and the counter only goes up. Three months in, nobody opens the dashboard anymore, not because it is badly made, but because nobody is ever going to have the time to empty it. A diagnosis is only worth something while somebody executes it.
If you already have someone writing and publishing —an in-house person, a writer or an agency— and all you are missing is the list of what to touch, a content audit tool solves exactly that and will suit you better than we will. The fix, which is what we add, you already have covered.
And if what you are after is the technical picture of the whole site —crawling, redirects, speed, product pages, categories, URL structure—, we are not the right place either: Content Mood looks at the blog of an online store and its connection to the catalog, not the technical health of the entire domain. They are two different jobs and they can run side by side.
Frequently asked questions
What is a content audit tool?
It is software that scans your site and returns a report with the problems it finds: posts losing positions, duplicate titles, articles with no internal links, content nobody reads anymore. It delivers it in a dashboard and updates it every time it scans again. Its job ends at the list.
Is Content Mood a content audit tool?
Not exactly. It does make the diagnosis, but it does not end there: it writes the change to apply, links it to real product pages and categories in your catalog and leaves it ready for you to review and publish. The diagnosis is the first step of the cycle, diagnose, refresh and connect, not the whole product.
Then why does Content Mood also offer a free diagnosis?
Because it is the way in, not the product. The free diagnosis shows you which posts are losing traffic, which ones cannibalize each other and how many link to the catalog, so you see the real state of your blog before paying anything. If the cycle stopped there, we would be one more content audit tool. What you pay for is what comes next: the fix written, linked and measured.
Can I use a content audit tool and Content Mood at the same time?
Yes, and in many cases it makes sense. A content audit tool looks at the whole site in technical terms: redirects, crawling, speed, product pages, categories. Content Mood looks at the blog of an online store in commercial terms and produces the fix. They cover different things and they do not get in each other's way.
Why can a content audit tool not tell me which product page to link to?
Because it does not know what you sell. It can detect that an article has no outbound links, which is an objective fact in the HTML. Choosing the destination takes reading your catalog, understanding which product or category answers the intent of that post and writing the link inside the text. That is commercial judgment, not a technical check.
What happens after the engine proposes a change?
You review it. Nothing gets published without your approval: you see the previous version and the new one, you approve or reject, and you export a CSV to upload to your CMS. The URL stays, the previous version is saved, and afterwards the before and after of the refreshed post are compared.
The diagnosis is the beginning, not the deliverable
You see for free which posts are losing traffic, which ones cannibalize each other and how many link to the catalog. And after that, the fix for each one, written and ready for you to review.
Get my diagnosisno card · the diagnosis is free · we email you once